That's a good option that didn't occur to me. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Adam Foltzer <acfolt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Since the HP Minimal fits such a similar niche, perhaps we could adapt the > existing minimal installer language in-place to point to HP Minimal, rather > than removing it. Then we could modify the existing HP section in-place to > clarify that it refers to HP Full. > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Jason Dagit <dag...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I just realized that the Minimal installer listed first on the Downloads >> page (https://www.haskell.org/downloads) is deprecated and "dead". This >> creates an unfortunate situation where our top suggested way to get haskell >> immediately tells the user it's dead. >> >> I think that we should remove mention of the minimal installer ASAP on >> the grounds that the HP now comes in minimal and full variants. >> >> Furthermore, I would like to make the recommendation that we list the HP >> above other methods as even the minimal HP installer ships with stack (at >> least on windows it does). >> >> Between the two changes, I think the first one is crucial and the second >> one is merely reasonable. >> >> Thanks, >> Jason >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-community mailing list >> Haskell-community@haskell.org >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list Haskell-community@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
