Adam Foltzer writes:
> The view that Cabal is stagnant is very outdated,
> most notably with respect to the overall pace and vigor of the Cabal
> issue tracker, and the excitement around the `cabal new-build`
> Nix-style commands.

What about the backpack-related work?  Isn't cabal-install where the
user-facing CLI side of this work is most likely to be landed?

-- 
с уважениeм / respectfully / Z poważaniem,
Косырев Сергей
_______________________________________________
Haskell-community mailing list
Haskell-community@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community

Reply via email to