Adam Foltzer writes: > The view that Cabal is stagnant is very outdated, > most notably with respect to the overall pace and vigor of the Cabal > issue tracker, and the excitement around the `cabal new-build` > Nix-style commands.
What about the backpack-related work? Isn't cabal-install where the user-facing CLI side of this work is most likely to be landed? -- с уважениeм / respectfully / Z poważaniem, Косырев Сергей _______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list Haskell-community@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community