Maybe, it worth to change releases number to time-based numbering e.g: * 2009.05.04 instead 2009.2.0 * 2009.06.01 instead 2009.2.1 * 2009.07.13 instead 2009.2.2
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@worc.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > All, > > So, release dates. We're supposed to be doing time-based releases. Let's > pick some dates! > > Releases: > * 2009.2.0, Monday 4th May > * 2009.2.1, Monday 1st June (4 weeks after .0) > * 2009.2.2, Monday 13th July (6 weeks after .1) > > First release is very soon (this coming Monday -- less than a week!). We > will call it a public beta. Then we have 4 weeks to incorporate feedback > about the installers, make minor bumps to some packages and do another > release. > > Comments? Does this seem reasonable and realistic? > > If so I'll put it on the wiki and perhaps spread the info more widely to > try and attract more testers. > > Duncan > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-platform mailing list > Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org > http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform > -- LC, ("Solo porque seas un paranoico no significa que no te persigan." - Kurt Cobain) _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
