On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 15:05 +0000, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > Duncan Coutts <duncan.cou...@...> writes: > > > It's not as simple as I'd like. Does anyone have any better suggestions > > that fit our requirements? > > What about 2009.1.0-beta1 ?
Sadly we do not have the luxury of strings in our version numbers. Cabal packages use a sequence of positive integers (because this translates easily into all other formats where as strings cause no end of problems in translation, eg how do version numbers compare, is beta2 >= rc3? etc). Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform