On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Don Stewart <don...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's all you need to do - but it might not happen for this release. Just to be sure I'm understanding: It is acceptable for this code to remain in three auxiliary packages, and therefore for HP to have to ship them, so long as the modules don't directly inhabit the Data. module name space. Or did you mean not only do the modules need to be renamed, but the packages have to be folded back into OpenGL and/or GLUT? I'm assuming that if the first is the aim of the platform committee, then we wouldn't be publishing those three packages in what makes up the HP package list. Of course, in any installation not only will the modules be listed in the documentation, but the packages themselves will be apparent. This is the same as for packages that come with GHC that aren't part of the platform (think ghc-prim, or binary). As for timing, I'm hoping that we can start building trial installers this coming weekend. Hence, I'd like to have the package version list finished by end of this week. - Mark
_______________________________________________ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
