David Roundby wrote: > I'd like to second this. I've been annoyed by the fact that ghc > requires extra subdirectories in order to use hierarchical modules, > and would be doubly annoyed if the language definition declared that > this couldn't be fixed. jhc's behavior sounds nicer, but I'd rather > there were the possibility of naming our haskell files whatever we > liked.
And I'd like to second that! But not a Haskell' issue (I hope). Best, /Henrik -- Henrik Nilsson School of Computer Science and Information Technology The University of Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
