On Tue, 04 Apr 2006, Andy Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > let xs' () = 1 : 2 : xs' () > let xs2 = xs' > > let xs = 1 : 2 : xs > > So deepSeq xs2 ==> _|_, but deepSeq xs ==> xs > > I appeal to the "morally correct reasoning" argument .. If the program > terminates, then it is still correct.
To avoid confusion I'd like to note that this has nothing to do with the kind of moral correctness that I and some others wrote about recently. (I guess that this is the downside of choosing a phrase like that. :) -- /NAD _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime