On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:34:09AM -0500, Spencer Janssen wrote:
> How about an implementation that sets the deepSeq'd bit *after* each
> field has been successfully deepSeq'd? deepSeq'ing a cyclic structure
> would behave just like an infinite structure.
what would be the point of having a bit then?
in any case, we should talk about the meaning of deepseqing something,
not its implementation.
depth limited recursive seq seems like the best route to me.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
