On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Yitzchak Gale wrote: > Yitzchak Gale wrote: > > > Of course, this is not really the joy of > > > pattern guards. It is the joy of monads, > > > with perhaps a few character strokes > > > saved by a confusing overloading of (<-). > > Philippa Cowderoy wrote: > > I don't find it any more confusing than the overloading > > of ->. > > You mean that it is used both for lambda abstractions > and for functional dependencies? True, but those > are so different that there is no confusion. >
You missed out case statements. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "My religion says so" explains your beliefs. But it doesn't explain why I should hold them as well, let alone be restricted by them. _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
