... <= is already used as "smaller than or equal to" :)
...what about this: pattern =< expr
... let!, perhaps, but that would probably be too noisy for pattern guards? (also, we don't want to steal nice infix ops like <==)
I had suggested <<- I wouldn't mind <-- or <== or the like. I think any of these better suggest "similiarity to <- yet different". (<= would have been perfect. Humph! They beat us to it.) -Yitz _______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
