On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:09:56AM +0900, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
> just to be clarify for those who are still interested: i'm not
> suggesting we should *change* the process as much as *extend* it.
> once the committee has finalized haskell-prime, ask everybody
> (literally everybody) for a boolean.
I am pretty sure that everybody in this thread already knows, but
just to clarify how Scheme proceeded: the vote was held on the
mailing list and a template was given, like
Name:
Location:
Organisation (optional):
Contact (optional):
Vote:
Rationale:
As you would expect the quality of voting (example [1]) was much
much higher than "1 like = 1 monad".
[1]
https://web.archive.org/web/20140601050807/http://lists.scheme-reports.org/pipermail/scheme-reports/2013-April/003310.html
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
