On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Richard Eisenberg <r...@cs.brynmawr.edu> wrote:
> I don't mean to be a killjoy, but I think even something as simple as this > should have a proposal. We still have to draft the changes to the Report > associated with this change, and at least one is non-obvious: now numeric > literals induce an Eq constraint (which should be mentioned). I'm certainly > not against this change, but I don't think it's as easy as this. > I agree. I just I thought it was implicit that every change to the report goes throught a pull request, which is the same as a proposal. Were you volunteering for something else, Carter?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-prime mailing list Haskell-prime@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
