Original-Via: uk.ac.nsf; Wed, 27 Nov 91 21:41:15 GMT
Original-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a copy of the Haskell 1.1 report, except for the first ten
pages or so which our LaserWriter refused to print (probably a dvi2ps
problem).
Is anyone else having this problem?
Anyway, how should I cite it correctly? (bibTeX entry preferred)
The bib entry I use is:
@techreport{haskell11
,author="Hudak, P. and Peyton Jones, S. and Wadler (editors), P."
,title="Report on the {P}rogramming {L}anguage {H}askell,
{A} {N}on-strict {P}urely {F}unctional {L}anguage ({V}ersion 1.1)"
,institution="Yale University, Department of Computer Science"
,month=Aug
,year=1991
,number="YALEU/DCS/RR777"
}
(the placement of "(editors)" is a hack to fool bibtex)
There's probably a similar entry for the Glasgow version, but the
documents are identical by design.
Is it to appear in a well-known journal?
Funny you should ask: The 1.1 Report, with typos and ambiguities
fixed, will appear in a special issue of Sigplan Notices -- I believe
the March issue, but we're not 100% certain yet. I suppose this
should be Version 1.2, or maybe 1.11... Simon Peyton Jones is
assembling the final draft.
-Paul
