> >But I think we can have the cake and eat it too, if we get rid of the > >restriction (which I never liked) that operators beginning with : must be a > >constructor: just define > >a := b = (a,b) > > Unfortunately that won't work if := had been used in patterns. Nonsense. Of course constructors can be arbitrary symbols (and identifiers), it just makes the compiler a little more complicated. -- Lennart
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Lennart Augustsson
- Arrays and Assoc John Launchbury
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Thomas Johnsson
- Re: Arrays and Assoc John Launchbury
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Joe Fasel
- Arrays and Assoc rabin
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Thomas Johnsson
- Re: Arrays and Assoc Thomas Johnsson