Hi All,

> Surely messages about specific Haskell implementations are of potential
> interest to the majority of readers on the Haskell mailing list?  Are
> you saying that messages about some cool new feature in nhc, or some
> puzzling results obtained using Hugs, or some new observation about
> the ghc environment are not suitable for the Haskell mailing list?
> I don't want to have to subscribe to four or more system specific
> mailing lists just to keep up with happenings in the Haskell world!

I support Mark here, as it may be to much to expect people interested
in Haskell to belong to 5 or 6 different mailing lists. I, for
example, only belong to the Haskell (and some others not related to
Haskell) mailing list and not to the implementation specific
ones. However, this means that I may miss out on discussion about
multiple parameter type classes if posted to the Hugs mailing list
only, for example.

Best wishes

Ben

--------
Benedict R. Gaster.
Languages and Programming Group, University of Nottingham.
A thing of beauty is a joy forever -- John Keats (1795--1821).


Reply via email to