At 19:54 +0100 98/09/24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The generalization of the Int type, as I see it, is a binary type, a
>> sequence of bit of fixed length, which has special operations such as
>> right/left shift with under/overflow, rotations, signed/unsigned arithmetic
>> and Boolean bit operations.
>
>agreed, though I think there is a strong case of providing most of
>those operations on Integer too (perhaps at a different type).
Then some of those operations, like complement and rotate, probably
should have the bit length of the operation as an extra argument.
Hans Aberg
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
- Re: Int vs Integer Keith S. Wansbrough
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Int vs Integer Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Int vs Integer Philip Wadler
- Fwd: Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- RE: Int vs Integer Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Int vs Integer Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Int vs Integer Philip Wadler
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- Int vs Integer S.J.Thompson
