> I must say that I am now strongly inclined to adopt (2); that is, > to make Haskell 98 be the same as Haskell 1.4 on Int vs Integer matter. Thank you Simon for those sensible words. I'm for a very conservative design for Haskell 98; we can always play around with new ideas in Haskell 2.000 (or whatever it's going to be called). -- Lennart
- Fwd: Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- Re: Int vs Integer Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- RE: Int vs Integer Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Int vs Integer Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Int vs Integer Philip Wadler
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Chris Dornan
- Int vs Integer S.J.Thompson
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg
- Re: Int vs Integer Simon Marlow
- Re: Int vs Integer Hans Aberg