RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure?

[Jan Skibinski]

> >If neither the reduction count nor the timing are appriopriate
> >measures of efficiency in Hugs, then what is? Is there any
> >profiling tool available for the interpreter?
> 
> Since modern CPU's are developed as to make more commonly used assembler
> instructions faster, the only way to find out the speed of the components
> of a program is to use a profiler.
> 
        Looks like you missed my last question:
        "Is there any profiling tool available for the interpreter?"
        I meant: "for Hugs" but if HBI has some I would gladly
        use it.

        Jan