> May I at least assume the implication: > reduction_count1 > reduction_count2 ==> time1 > time2 ? I'm not sure how the reduction count is done in Hugs, but if it simply counts G-machine instructions then you can't assume even this. It's likely to be true, but G-machine instructions can vary quite a lot in execution time. Lennart
- Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Lennart Augustsson
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Mark P Jones
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Hans Aberg
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Hans Aberg
- RE: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Jan Skibinski
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Fergus Henderson
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Reduction count as efficiency measure? Graeme Moss