Re: The dreaded layout rule

[Wolfram Kahl]

Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
 > 
 > > In other words, it is a bug (and GHC and Hugs don't do it
 > > right - see my previous message; from your comment, I
 > > presume HBC also doesn't follow the definition).  I think,
 > > the only Right Thing is to remove this awful rule (unless
 > > somebody comes up with a rule that can be decided locally).
 > 
 > Maybe so.  But (H98 editors hat on) this is more than a "typo".

I am surprised!  ;-)  

 > It's a Haskell 2  issue.  Perhaps there will be no fully conforming 
 > H98 compilers!

Perhaps it would be a reasonable Haskell 1.6 issue?


Wolfram