Re: tuple component functions

[Jon . Fairbairn]

On 16 Sep, Keith Wansbrough wrote:
> I suggest calling them "pi13" or "prj13" rather than "tuple31", though.

pi1_3 or proj1_3 or select_1_3 or sel_1_3, even s_1_3 -- omitting the
"_" means sel1111 is ambiguous (!).  We should choose a scheme that can
cope with such things even if they are unlikely.

I don't think pi_m_n looks right unless you replace pi with the greek
letter (UNICODE, anyone?).

-- 
Jón Fairbairn                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]