> Either, cpp (or some preprocessor standard), should be made part of the
> Haskell language definition or Haskell files that require a preprocessor
> should have a different extension.
>
> Since, I assume that the hugs team has a good reason not to build in cpp
> functionality, I am suggesting that Haskell files with preprocessor
> directives have the extension .hs.cpp
While I can see Alex' point, I have mixed feelings on this one: you
could argue the same thing about _any_ non-standard extention to the
language. Whether they're implemented by a pre-processor or not seems
to me largely a secondary issue.
'Ware the slippery slope...
Slán,
Alex.
