On 04-Oct-1999, George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (b) a type of compile-time if statement which will branch on simple > arithmetic and boolean expressions in constant values and constants, > which doesn't typecheck the branch which isn't taken. For example, > this is what Java provides and I think it's not too bad. Are you sure Java provides that? I had a brief glance at the Java Language Specification, and I didn't spot any construct matching that description. So I suspect that you may be mistaken. If not, I'd appreciate seeing a reference, e.g. to the relevant section of the JLS <http://java.sun.com/doc/books/jls/index.html>. -- Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Alex Ferguson
- CPP is not part of Haskell S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: CPP is not part of Haskell Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell George Russell
- RE: CPP is not part of Haskell Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: CPP is not part of Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell George Russell
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Jan Skibinski
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Fergus Henderson
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Matthias Kilian
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Lennart Augustsson
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: CPP is not part of Haskell Frank A. Christoph
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell George Russell
- RE: CPP is not part of Haskell Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Andy Gill
- Re: CPP is not part of Haskell Fergus Henderson