RE: OO in Haskell

[Frank A. Christoph]

Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> Ok here is my partial list.
>
> - True ad-doc polymorphism
> - Built in dynamic typing system.
> - State Encapsulation
> - A solution to the abilities arising from multi parameter type classes.
> - Syntactic sugar for supporting OO programming styles

What is the significance of dynamic typing being "built in"?

What do you mean by "state encapsulation"?

What sort of syntactic sugar is it that you want?

--FAC