Re: Re: OO in Haskell

[Juergen Pfitzenmaier]

Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> ....I don't like
> languages that try to stay simple because doing complex things in simple
> languages in well, frustrating.  Can you agree with me here?

What exactly do you mean ? I can put together simple things to get
a complex tool that I can view again as a simple thing etc etc in haskell.
If I try to do the same in C++ or Java I fall over design flaws in the
language or over my own unreadable code because it became impossible
to stick to some useful shape.
That last sentence is not just a saying -- I had to drop a project
in C++ together with somethings that really meant value for me -
only because of the braindamaged handling of templates in C++.

ciao pfitzen