Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | - Does other Haskell implementations (ghc, nhc, hbc, ...) > | would provide this extension in next releases? (This way, > | even been an extension, my system would be portable) > > Jeff Lewis is well advanced with adding functional dependencies > into GHC; I believe that he plans then to add dynamic scopes, which > are elegantly expressed in terms of functional dependencies. > I'll quibble a little: implicit parameters can be implemented elegantly by borrowing some of the mechanism of functional dependencies. Thus, I'm implementing FDs in GHC first, then adding implicit parameters. But it's not the case that once you have functional dependencies, you've got implicit parameters for free. --Jeff
- Dynamic scopes in Haskell José Romildo Malaquias
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell José Romildo Malaquias
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Ch. A. Herrmann
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell José Romildo Malaquias
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Ch. A. Herrmann
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell José Romildo Malaquias
- RE: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Michael Erik Florentin Nielsen
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell José Romildo Malaquias
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Hask... Peter Hancock
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Koen Claessen
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell José Romildo Malaquias
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Hask... Koen Claessen
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Michael Erik Florentin Nielsen
- Re: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Koen Claessen
- RE: Dynamic scopes in Haskell Simon Marlow