Is not deleteBy :: (a->Bool) -> [a] -> [a] more natural for the library than deleteBy :: (a->a->Bool) -> a -> [a] -> [a] ? For example, to remove the first negative from a list, people suggest usually deleteBy (< 0) [1,2,-1,3] While deleteBy (>) 0 [1,2,-1,3] needs thinking effort. ------------------ Sergey Mechveliani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: deleteBy type S.D.Mechveliani
- Re: deleteBy type Jon Fairbairn
- Re: deleteBy type Hannah Schroeter
- Re: deleteBy type Mariano Suarez Alvarez
- Re: deleteBy type S.D.Mechveliani
- Re: deleteBy type Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk