Chris Okasaki wrote:

> For the people that share this sentiment, can you please
> explain why ints that are too big should not similarly
> give an error?  I can see both being ok, or both being
> errors.  I just don't see why one should be ok and the
> other an error.

IMHO, both should be errors.  If we really need, we can provide
takeSloppy, takeBackwards, etc, but the default should be a tight as
possible to catch errors.

I still believe that take and drop should satisfy the compositional laws
on legal arguments.

Regards,

  Tommy


Reply via email to