I'm with Jon Fairbairn on this. Negative arguments are an error because the domain of take and drop is the naturals. The problem is that we use Int to represent naturals. -- P > For the people that share this sentiment, can you please > explain why ints that are too big should not similarly > give an error? I can see both being ok, or both being > errors. I just don't see why one should be ok and the > other an error.
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... BYRNE, Peter
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... Dr. Mark E. Hall
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing ty... Pablo E. Martinez Lopez
- Re: drop & take [was: fixin... Ola Fosheim Grøstad
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Chris Okasaki
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... Tommy Thorn
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... Philip Wadler
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing ty... Joe Fasel
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing ty... Chris Okasaki
- Re: drop & take [was: fixin... Philip Wadler
- Re: drop & take [was: fixin... Joe Fasel
- Re: drop & take [was: fixin... Fergus Henderson
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... D. Tweed
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing ty... D. Tweed
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... Matt Harden
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Roberto E. Lublinerman
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk