Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes on my letter on Basic algebra proposal
>> These features are not mandatory in proposal. The jury may decide to
>> rewrite the proposal removing the usage of these features.
>> [..].
> I think the "jury" is unlikely to rewrite the proposal;
> more likely, they will simply reject the proposal.
> It is up to the proponent(s) of the proposal to rewrite it.
It needs clarification.
The Proposal says that it is draft.
I thought that some committee, - which I called "jury"
(maybe, wrongly), - has to consider it.
If the committee decides that it is too hard to revise the proposal
to something satisfactory, it tells the author that the proposal is
rejected.
Otherwise, it recommends the author in what way to revise the
proposal, and after the revision, considers it again.
This was my naive idea of considering the library standard.
The committee may be official or in-formal, it may consist of a
sidle person or of 1000, I do not know.
But I had to refer to it in a letter, somewhat call it.
I have no idea of how such committee may appear.
Neither do I care much of what with this proposal will happen.
------------------
Sergey Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
