On Wed, 3 May 2000, S.D.Mechveliani wrote:
>
> > But this is not good enough to attract general attention
> > and to make it easy to discuss about. The onus is still
> > on you, to be frank.
>
> It is large enough. If I expand it with more comments, people will
> be frightened by its messiness and would speak more about its
> complexity. Probably, it is better to add the comments in the form
> of responses. But, for example, you wrote more than page of
> comments, and there is nothing to really respond. The impression is
> still that the proposal had not been read.
Responding to your challenge I am sending to you
a very long private note with suggestions how to
restructure your current proposal.
Jan
