Sergey:
I will only make a short observation here - skipping
other unnecessary details which do not move this
discussion in right direction.
You misread me, I wanted to help. Specifically, I sensed
a tone of resignation in your letter dated Wed, 26 Apr, 2000
in reponse to Fergus:
Fergus:> I think the "jury" is unlikely to rewrite the proposal;
Fergus:> more likely, they will simply reject the proposal.
Fergus:> It is up to the proponent(s) of the proposal to rewrite it.
Sergey:>>I have no idea of how such committee may appear.
Sergey:>>Neither do I care much of what with this proposal will happen.
If you are satisfied with a current process, I rest
my case.
Friendly,
Jan
P.S. I read your proposal. I saw your comments within
it. I could even extract some sort of a small and
a big picture.
But this is not good enough to attract general attention
and to make it easy to discuss about. The onus is still
on you, to be frank.
