I also support the idea's , and It doesn't chande the language it only
structures it, but I am a lightweight in Haskellland.
Sometimes I wonder if the readers are overworked or just plainly arrogant.
Friendly
Jan Brosius
----- Original Message -----
From: Jan Skibinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: S.D.Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: discussing basAlgPropos
>
> Sergey:
>
> I will only make a short observation here - skipping
> other unnecessary details which do not move this
> discussion in right direction.
> You misread me, I wanted to help. Specifically, I sensed
> a tone of resignation in your letter dated Wed, 26 Apr, 2000
> in reponse to Fergus:
>
> Fergus:> I think the "jury" is unlikely to rewrite the proposal;
> Fergus:> more likely, they will simply reject the proposal.
> Fergus:> It is up to the proponent(s) of the proposal to rewrite it.
>
> Sergey:>>I have no idea of how such committee may appear.
> Sergey:>>Neither do I care much of what with this proposal will happen.
>
>
> If you are satisfied with a current process, I rest
> my case.
>
> Friendly,
> Jan
>
> P.S. I read your proposal. I saw your comments within
> it. I could even extract some sort of a small and
> a big picture.
> But this is not good enough to attract general attention
> and to make it easy to discuss about. The onus is still
> on you, to be frank.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
