Benjamin Leon Russell wrote: > However, according to the C# Language Reference, > "For developers who are generally content with > automatic memory management but sometimes need > fine-grained control or that extra iota of > performance, C# provides the ability to write > “unsafe” code. Such code can deal directly with > pointer types, and fix objects to temporarily > prevent the garbage collector from moving them." > [Section 1.2] I hadn't known that. Guess I didn't read far enough, or perhaps it wasn't covered in the book I was reading. I agree that this is likely to be abused. Craig
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Byron Hale
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Antony Courtney
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Lyndon While
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime R.S. Nikhil
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson