At 6:46 pm -0400 10/8/2000, Benjamin Leon Russell wrote: >Somebody once wrote that a clearly written, well-documented program >that doesn't work is usually more valuable than a badly written, >poorly-documented program that does work because it can easily be >fixed and reused. Who wrote this? Is it just a rumour or is there a reference that I can give to my students? -- Lyndon While -------- Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,-_|\ Phone - +61 8 9380 2720 / \ Fax - +61 8 9380 1089 *_,-._/ Web - http://www.cs.uwa.edu.au/~lyndon v
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Byron Hale
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Antony Courtney
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Lyndon While
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime R.S. Nikhil
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime John David Stone
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime John David Stone
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Jan Skibinski
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Sylvan Ravinet
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson