On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Robert Ennals wrote: > Thus if we want to "inherit" our implicit paramater, we would have: > > f ?y x = (x :: Int) + ?y I like the current solution better. They are called "implicit parameters" because they are, well, implicit :-) -- Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism kahl
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Dylan Thurston
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Robert Ennals
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Robert Ennals
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Erik Meijer
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Rishiyur S. Nikhil
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis