Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism

[Robert Ennals]

> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Robert Ennals wrote:
> 
> > Thus if we want to "inherit" our implicit paramater, we would have:
> > 
> > f ?y x = (x :: Int) + ?y
> 
> I like the current solution better. They are called "implicit parameters"
> because they are, well, implicit :-)

The semantics is still implicit.

When one calls the function f, one would only explicitly pass x, not y.

Eg one can do

g :: (y :: Int) => Int
g ?y = f 1


And for top level functions, one could make it optional anyway, as there is 
nowhere else for the variable to have come from.


-Rob




_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell