But a term with an "implicit" argument is a function no matter how you turn it, you just don't write the argument explicitely. I don't buy that. You could equally well say a term with a free variable is a "function" (of the environment): sure it is, but if it's bound with a let then the function is called only once. John _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Erik Meijer
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Rishiyur S. Nikhil
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism C.Reinke
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk