Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > John: just to check, you do realise that (B) means > > a) That adding a type signature can change the dynamic semantics > of the program. This would be the first and only occurrence of > such behaviour. Not so, there are already Haskell program that give a different results with and without type signatures. -- Lennart _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Robert Ennals
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Erik Meijer
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Rishiyur S. Nikhil
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Andreas Rossberg
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism C.Reinke