| wxWindows is quite C++ centric and AFAIK nobody has made a | serious effort at a C++ FFI yet. One of the big advantages | of GTK+ is that it was written with bindings for other | languages in mind. Therefore, it is probably the toolkit | with the most language bindings. The lack of any way to interface to C++ is a problem, IMO. I would love to be able to write Haskell programs using Qt and ultimately the KDE libraries, both of which are C++, but I can't, at the mo. J _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Wolfgang Jeltsch
- RE: The future of Haskell discussion brk
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Mark Carroll
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Wolfgang Jeltsch
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Peter Achten
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Johannes Waldmann
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Rijk-Jan van Haaften
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Julian Seward (Intl Vendor)
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion D. Tweed
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion exa
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Pixel
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Bill Halchin
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Mark Carroll
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Jeffrey Palmer