Mark Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote: > (snip) > > wxWindows is quite C++ centric and AFAIK nobody has made a > > serious effort at a C++ FFI yet. One of the big advantages > (snip) > > Of course, wxPython also exists - I assume that the emphasis on object > orientation is the problem? Also, the lack of a static type system makes it easier to embed foreign APIs into Python. Manuel _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion C.Reinke
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Mark Carroll
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Frank Atanassow
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Wolfgang Jeltsch
- RE: The future of Haskell discussion brk
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Mark Carroll
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Wolfgang Jeltsch
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Peter Achten
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Johannes Waldmann
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Rijk-Jan van Haaften
- RE: The future of Haskell discussion Julian Seward (Intl Vendor)
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion D. Tweed
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion exa
- Re: The future of Haskell discussion Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk