On 30-Aug-2003 Hal Daume III wrote: > Hi fellow Haskellers, > > I'm attempting to get a sense of the topology of the Haskell > community. Based on the Haskell Communities & Activities reports, it > seems that the large majority of people use Haskell for Haskell's sake.
I have been working on a software-engineering tool that is intended to derive SQL-DDL-Statements, XML-Schema-Documents, and Java classes from a common schema definition which is written in some UML-like language (with a proper semantics of course). The tool will furthermore generate java-code for the conversion of complex objects (that is, instances of certain subgraphs of the eschema) along the paths SQL<->Java, SQL<->XML, Java<->XML. The project will however be cancelled before it reaches a state where the software could actually deployed. Everything except of the frontend that is a graphical editor for schemata, has been written in Haskell. It is surely not "Haskell for Haskell" but "Haskell for the Rest of the World". Elke Kasimir. Software Development EsPresto AG ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Breite Str. 30-31 Tel/Fax: +49-30-90 226-750/-760 10178 Berlin/Germany _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
