All clear now. :) Much appreciated, Isaac! - Conal
On 8/14/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Conal Elliott wrote: > > Hi David. Thanks for the reply. > > > > I'm pretty confused. I understand your first paragraph as saying *not* > to > > use that repo, and the second as saying to use it. Is the new haddock > > included in GHC 6.7 or is it still an app that works separately from > GHC? > > If the latter, where is the app's repo? > > haddock.ghc and ghc.haddock are different. Haddock.ghc needs a GHC with > the patches from ghc.haddock. The latest GHC 6.7 has ghc.haddock > patches. Haddock.ghc is the new haddock, which requires those GHC > capabilities. So you need GHC 6.7 *and* haddock.ghc. Does that clear > up the rather confusing naming scheme? > > Isaac > _______________________________________________ > Haskell mailing list > Haskell@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell >
_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
