On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:45:43PM -0700, Ashley Yakeley wrote: > Isaac Dupree wrote: > >> haddock.ghc and ghc.haddock are different. Haddock.ghc needs a GHC with >> the patches from ghc.haddock. The latest GHC 6.7 has ghc.haddock patches. >> Haddock.ghc is the new haddock, which requires those GHC capabilities. >> So you need GHC 6.7 *and* haddock.ghc. Does that clear up the rather >> confusing naming scheme? > > So presumably ghc.haddock provides some new API that haddock.ghc uses to > get parse information?
Yup, modern GHC can parse Haddock comments and return them in the API. Disgustingly non-compositional, but it gets the job done, and is much better than just copying code... Stefan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
