On February 10, 2015 17:44:54 Dan Doel wrote: > Really, I think the least ad-hoc solution (other than a hypothetical > best-of-both-worlds inference algorithm) would be to allow code like: > > runST do ... > > where you can apply expressions directly to certain syntactic constructs > without an operator in between. I suspect the majority of cases where > 'runST $' is used are followed by a 'do,' and not having the remaining ones > wouldn't be nearly as painful to use with parentheses (since they likely > wouldn't be multi-line). And this extension is desirable for other reasons > as well (though I can't recall any specifics off the top of my head).
I would like that a lot even if not for this case. It's always seemed kind of silly that you have to throw in a $. Cheers! -Tyson _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
