On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:29:16PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:45:07PM +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote:
> 
> > It's a great test, but many people only write code when they get payed for 
> > it, and in those situations they can't legitimately keep a private copy of 
> > it and discuss it with potential employers. Which means that their previous 
> > projects have to be discussed without actual code listings.
> 
> Which means no interview.  I would no more hire someone as a programmer
> who doesn't write stuff for himself than I would hire someone as a
> brewer who didn't drink alcohol.


I think the analogy is more "not hiring brewers that don't brew at home".


When I hire (granted, it has been a while that I interviewed people, and
I don't miss it), I don't really care what people do at home. In fact,
I don't really care about hiring people that think they qualify for a
Unix sysadmin job because they run a Linux box at home.


Abigail

Attachment: pgp8BqHyeylVI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to