Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 13 Jan 2008, at 18:23, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
Tony Finch skribis 2008-01-13 16:02 (+0000):
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Lately I've been toying with ISO date integer versions, for that
"what, you're
using the 2005 version?! Your shit is OLD! UPGRADE NOW!" effect.
http://use.perl.org/~schwern/journal/35127
How do you handle parallel stable/dev/etc. branches?
Oh, that's easy: stable releases are done on even days, while
development releases are done on odd days =)
No, no - the version number should be the Unix epoch time shifted left
two or three bits and the LSBs indicate the type :)
FOOLS! You should all be using PIP TIME!!! And for a second helping of hate
you should combine it with X.Y.Z versions!!
http://search.cpan.org/~pip/
At the sound of the strangled cry for help the time will be exactly 81DAV4s!
*GRKlkk...*
(I actually think PIP time is really clever and compact and at least
potentially human readable, yet still INSANE)
--
29. The Irish MPs are not after “Me frosted lucky charms”.
-- The 213 Things Skippy Is No Longer Allowed To Do In The U.S. Army
http://skippyslist.com/?page_id=3
