* Marco Von Ballmoos <[email protected]> [2008-04-09 21:05]: > I would, however, be willing to accept the risk in exchange for > the increase in expressiveness.
Well, the problem is, if you're willing to risk that, you can just do the job without generics -- just use a regular container and cast when you take an object out of it, the way you used to do before generics were added. The entire point of generics is to allow for moving that type check from runtime to compile time. [PS.: can people please take me out of CC when replying on this subthread. I am already subscribed to the list proper and don't need an extra copy of each mail. Thanks.] Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
