On 2008-04-09, at 14:34, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Well, the problem is, if you're willing to risk that, you can just do the job without generics -- just use a regular container and cast when you take an object out of it, the way you used to do before generics were added.
But that means that instead of having a remote risk of a run-time exception, you're completely abandoning type-safety.
