On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:12:24 +0100, David Cantrell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:43:20PM -0500, Peter da Silva wrote:
>
> > The hate here isn't "Perl lets you load guns so people can shoot themselves
> > in the foot".
> >
> > It's "the bastards who wrote this code are setting someone's feet up the
> > gun".
>
> I see no hate. It's not like any sane person is ever going to
> "use MoveableType" and so get affected by it. Just about the only thing
> that's hateful is that the MT gang obviously don't do code coverage
> tests because they didn't remove this dead code. And hands up everyone
> here who has 100% coverage.
Almost :)
---------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
File stmt bran cond sub pod time total
---------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
CSV_XS.xs 99.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 99.0
blib/lib/Text/CSV_XS.pm 100.0 97.3 96.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.8
Total 99.3 97.3 96.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.9
---------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
And all the lines that are not covered have comments about the reason
why. Does that count as 100%
unless (csv->binary)
/* uncovered */ ERROR_INSIDE_FIELD (2030);
else
/* uncovered */ ERROR_INSIDE_FIELD (2036); /* I think there's no way to get
here */
> That's no-one then.
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x, 5.11.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00,
11.11, 11.23, and 11.31, SuSE 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin.
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
